Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH, 4000D-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10116-407
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH
Spinning
4000d-cxhx
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.44 out of 10) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH?

There are not much differences between the two comparables