Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs and a durability of 5.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
