Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight675g / 23.81oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano 19 Stella?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin YUPIE vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
