Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
