Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Shimano Sedona FJ, C2000SHGFJ, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SEC2000SHGFJ
Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000SHGFJ
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.44 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Sedona FJ?

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.