Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
