Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €199.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
