Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 5, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX
