Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
