Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10308-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Penn Squall II Levelwind, 20 LW, right hand, Multi Fishing Reel, Star Drag, 1545925
Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €130.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size20 LW
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeStar drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX and Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX stands out for a total score of 6.63 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT and Penn Squall II Levelwind?

There are not much differences between the two comparables