Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
92.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €469.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (5.8:1). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
