Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter / 33.46 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €479.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (85 centimeter / 33.46 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter / 33.46 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
