Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
