Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX offers a weight of 165g / 5,82oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
