Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
