Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
