Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.71 out of 10) and total score (6.32 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
