Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.71 out of 10) and total score (6.32 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX
