Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.71 out of 10) and total score (6.32 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX
