Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.71 out of 10 and a ball bearings of 6+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
