Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX and Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX offers a durability of 8.71 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Shimano Catana FE?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- Scoring 8.79 out of 10 (425g / 14,99oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
