Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.81 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €242.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.81 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
