Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.81 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €242.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.81 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
