Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.81 out of 10
Ergonomics5.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €242.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/300

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX edges out Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.81 out of 10 and a ball bearings of 6+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Caldia SW and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX
