Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
64.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs and a ball bearings of 5, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
