Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX edges out Delphin SHARX 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the ball bearings (5). Still, Delphin SHARX 4000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
