Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,06oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
