Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
65.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a ball bearings of 7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
