Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
69.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 7.67 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
