Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
76.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
