Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
83.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
