Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
