Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
