Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
