Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
77.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X offers a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
