Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
