Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
