Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
