Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X
