Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin REDIX?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
