Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
