Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X
