Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
