Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
