Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
