Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX