Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
