Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
