Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
