Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 5.5:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
